Shot in the News

There is no question: Military and tattoos go together naturally like blood and guts. Yet, a new Army rule may ban tattoos.
The new rule was approved by Secretary of the Army John McHugh, but not yet signed. The order would ban tattoos from the forearms, below the knee, or above the neckline. Tattoos deemed offensive must be removed regardless of location, and the soldier is required to pay for the removal.

What is considered to be offensive? Watching R.Lee Ermey playing the role as Gunnery Sargent Hartmann in Full Metal Jacket, I cannot imagine what could be offensive. Yet, the Army has found some tattoos distasteful.

Those tattoos or brands affiliated with “depicting, or symbolizing extremist philosophies, organizations, or activities.”
I am not sure what these could be. Perhaps Marxism or Socialist red diaper babies would count. My fear is that it could include Patriotic or Constitutional symbols.

The list of offensive tattoos also lists sexist tattoos that degrade a person based on gender. Are women in the service offended?

Read More:

Advertisements

About Matt Cole

Sr. Interface Analyst by day, and Writer by night. Google+| Facebook| Pinterest|Main Site|Plexus Ambassador#280147
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s